AIM PAPYRSign in
Tenders

Simulated evaluator

Before submitting it, look at your proposal through the committee's eyes: the points it would give in each value-judgement criterion, what the specifications say is assessed, what your proposal does well and what it lacks, each with its page.

How closely it matches the committee. In 40 lots of real evaluation reports, for each pair of bids that the committee scored differently, the evaluator ranks them the same way in 78.1 % of cases (by chance it would be 50 %), and its best bid is the committee's in 23 of 40. In points it deviates on average by 14.2 % of the maximum. Use it to see what your proposal lacks, not as the score you will get. How we measure it.

Obra de construcción del nuevo edificio 5L en el campus de Vera de la Universitat Politècnica de València
Rectorado de la Universitat Politècnica de València · expediente MY26/VICC/O/103
El anuncio no enlaza el pliego: valoraremos solo con los criterios.
Los criterios de juicio de valor

Los del anuncio. Corrígelos si el pliego los desglosa (por ejemplo, «Metodología» hasta 10 y «Equipo» hasta 5).

Tu memoria técnica

PDF o Word, como la vas a presentar (hasta 3 archivos). No la guardamos: se lee para valorarla y se olvida, y la lee un modelo alojado en la Unión Europea.

Es una simulación, no la valoración de la mesa ni asesoramiento jurídico.

Before submitting

Check the whole bid: that the price is not in the wrong envelope and that the technical proposal does not exceed the page limit.

Review my bid

This is the Sobre listo tool. It opens in another tab, in Document tools, outside Tenders: this page stays open so you can come back.