Simulated evaluator
Before submitting it, look at your proposal through the committee's eyes: the points it would give in each value-judgement criterion, what the specifications say is assessed, what your proposal does well and what it lacks, each with its page.
How closely it matches the committee. In 40 lots of real evaluation reports, for each pair of bids that the committee scored differently, the evaluator ranks them the same way in 78.1 % of cases (by chance it would be 50 %), and its best bid is the committee's in 23 of 40. In points it deviates on average by 14.2 % of the maximum. Use it to see what your proposal lacks, not as the score you will get. How we measure it.
Realizacion de un servicio de seguimiento cualitativo y cuantitativo de aquellas noticias y opiniones que se publiquen y se emitanen los medios de comunicacion convencionales television, radio, prensa
Viceconsejería de Comunicación y Relaciones con los Medios del Gobierno de Canarias · expediente SER/2026/0000219739
Leemos su pliego para saber qué valora cada criterio.
Viceconsejería de Comunicación y Relaciones con los Medios del Gobierno de Canarias · expediente SER/2026/0000219739
Leemos su pliego para saber qué valora cada criterio.