AIM PAPYRSign in
Tenders

Simulated evaluator

Before submitting it, look at your proposal through the committee's eyes: the points it would give in each value-judgement criterion, what the specifications say is assessed, what your proposal does well and what it lacks, each with its page.

How closely it matches the committee. In 40 lots of real evaluation reports, for each pair of bids that the committee scored differently, the evaluator ranks them the same way in 78.1 % of cases (by chance it would be 50 %), and its best bid is the committee's in 23 of 40. In points it deviates on average by 14.2 % of the maximum. Use it to see what your proposal lacks, not as the score you will get. How we measure it.

Obres de repavimentacio de carrers en la zona urbana de Castello
Alcaldía del Ayuntamiento de Castelló · expediente 5080/2026
Leemos su pliego para saber qué valora cada criterio.
Los criterios de juicio de valor

Los del anuncio. Corrígelos si el pliego los desglosa (por ejemplo, «Metodología» hasta 10 y «Equipo» hasta 5).

Tu memoria técnica

PDF o Word, como la vas a presentar (hasta 3 ficheros). No la guardamos: se lee para valorarla y se olvida, y la lee un modelo alojado en la Unión Europea.

Es una simulación, no la valoración de la mesa ni asesoramiento jurídico.